My time as a grad student and professor have given plenty of opportunities for success, failure, and casual observation. From choosing a grad program to publishing a book, we are constantly reminded that much of the “recipe book” for success as an academic is unwritten. Below are some of my general tips about entering and navigating the academic world.
Should I get a Ph.D?
I was tremendously underinformed when I made my own decisions about this. Don’t hesitate to ask for my thoughts during class, office hours, or any other time in person. One specific issue I always emphasize to students: do not view a Ph.D. as the next logical step in a life of success in school. Pursuing a Ph.D. in political science (or elsewhere) sometimes seems to just be the thing intellectually gifted people do. I disagree.
Being an academic isn’t just living a “life of the mind.” It can be a boring, tedious, frustrating job. And it is a very strange job. For me, a Ph.D. is only worth pursuing if a student has a realistic understanding of what the profession is like. This requires finding honest people to talk about what it’s like to “be a professor.” Do you think you will be happy and successful working in the highly unusual and unstructured day-to-day rhythm of a professor? To put it crudely, having no boss and no 9-5 and summers off sounds like a dream …but can be a real struggle, even a nightmare. It behooves students to ask faculty around campus to get a good sense of the realities of getting an academic job and day-to-day life as an academic.
How do I publish as a grad student?
We often hear: “the academic job market today dictates that grad students have to publish while in grad school.” OK sure. But how? Here’s a Twitter thread I did with tips on how to break it down into a manageable process, along with some useful comments from others in the responses.
What to do with tough comments?
From time to time we get tough written comments from folks more experienced or senior than us. What to do with them? Here’s a Twitter thread I did with some thoughts.
My work is often inspired by and empirically analyzed through archival historical materials. Here I’ve gathered some materials and tips for collecting and analyzing archival documents.
- The syllabus for my undergraduate course “The Secret Side of International Politics” has useful readings
- An excellent article on how digitizing archives is revolutionizing research across disciplines at UChicago
- This “Guide to Archival Research” from American Historical Association may be useful
- Marc Trachtenberg, a historian and international politics specialist, has a list of primary sources that is very helpful in the appendix in The Craft of International History
Online archival collections
More and more archival collections are being put online for anyone to use. Undergraduate and graduate students interested in doing this type of work might find these sources a useful place to begin.
Advice on archives
Must-read thread on the logistics of doing archival research at NARA II in College Park, MD from Audra Wolfe:
If you’re a student at UChicago, feel free to schedule a meeting to talk more about the above issues. I also welcome students interested in working with me for their graduate/undergraduate theses. Some things to keep in mind:
Policy on advising undergraduate/masters theses:
- In general, I advise theses that directly relate to my research areas. Sometimes I will advise projects that interest me for some other reason. Perhaps this is because it relates to topics I’m interested in working on in the future. There’s no easy way to know this besides contacting me with a (brief) note describing your interest area.
- Please keep in mind that, while issues of substantive fit will always be strongly considered, I may have to decline a request to advise if I have too many existing advisees. Feel free to check back with me in a quarter or two if I decline for this reason.
Policy on advising Ph.D. dissertations:
- In general, I advise students who have taken a seminar with me.
- I will consider advising a wide range of dissertation topics. A direct relationship to my work is not necessary.
- When discussing my potential role as an advisor for the Ph.D., be prepared to talk frankly about two issues. First, what your goals are after finishing your Ph.D., including your interest (or not) in teaching-heavy academic jobs and non-academic jobs. Second, the role you see me filling on your committee.
Policy on letter writing:
- Writing letters of recommendation is time consuming. In general, my policy is to only write letters for students who have been successful in a seminar I teach. For undergraduates, that means my taking my “Secret Side of International Politics” class and writing a very strong final paper. For graduate students, that means taking any grad seminar I offer and getting a high grade.
- Please request any letters no less than one month before the due date for letter writers.
- If I have not written a letter for you before, please also send an e-packet of relevant materials attached to one email. Most important is any written work you have done for me in a class. Also useful is a personal statement or similar overview of your experience at UChicago and future plans; unofficial transcript; resume / CV; other written work that is especially relevant and/or high quality; any background information about non-academic jobs, experiences, accomplishments that are relevant.
- Feel free to send a short email reminder a few days before any important deadlines.